<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Life of Hope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brianmclain.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/a-life-of-hope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brianmclain.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/a-life-of-hope/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Donato</title>
		<link>http://brianmclain.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/a-life-of-hope/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Donato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianmclain.wordpress.com/?p=318#comment-734</guid>
		<description>No, I haven&#039;t read Kik. Having an in-house post-millennialist like we do pretty much keeps me satisfied on that score. Incidentally, his new book, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prpbooks.com/inventory.html?target=indiv_title&amp;id=1716&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;From Age to Age&lt;/a&gt;, just came out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I haven&#8217;t read Kik. Having an in-house post-millennialist like we do pretty much keeps me satisfied on that score. Incidentally, his new book, <a href="http://www.prpbooks.com/inventory.html?target=indiv_title&amp;id=1716" rel="nofollow">From Age to Age</a>, just came out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianmclain</title>
		<link>http://brianmclain.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/a-life-of-hope/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>brianmclain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianmclain.wordpress.com/?p=318#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Yeah, there&#039;s probably a number of reasons, but this one was on my mind mostly because of the book... by the way, have you read it? I was probably generalizing too much... there are certainly some dispy&#039;s who don&#039;t act that way. But the separatists don&#039;t have an excuse either. Look at the Amish.... they make beautiful kitchen tables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there&#8217;s probably a number of reasons, but this one was on my mind mostly because of the book&#8230; by the way, have you read it? I was probably generalizing too much&#8230; there are certainly some dispy&#8217;s who don&#8217;t act that way. But the separatists don&#8217;t have an excuse either. Look at the Amish&#8230;. they make beautiful kitchen tables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Donato</title>
		<link>http://brianmclain.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/a-life-of-hope/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Donato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianmclain.wordpress.com/?p=318#comment-732</guid>
		<description>Hey, man. I was looking for ways to disagree with you on this (early prohibitionists were not just the fundamentalists; some were &quot;postmillennialists&quot; too).

I guess I&#039;d say rather that dispensationalism certainly fans this flame, but the real crux seems to be the second-degree separationist, revivalistic (think: Finney and the 2nd great awakening) and individualistic mentalities of the more modern &quot;fundamentalists&quot; (read: most evangelicals). It&#039;s a dualism most insidious, because it deems creation evil while maintaining that their version of the church is the most pure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, man. I was looking for ways to disagree with you on this (early prohibitionists were not just the fundamentalists; some were &#8220;postmillennialists&#8221; too).</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;d say rather that dispensationalism certainly fans this flame, but the real crux seems to be the second-degree separationist, revivalistic (think: Finney and the 2nd great awakening) and individualistic mentalities of the more modern &#8220;fundamentalists&#8221; (read: most evangelicals). It&#8217;s a dualism most insidious, because it deems creation evil while maintaining that their version of the church is the most pure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
